A Simple Call - Through Death to Life

"For if you live according to the flesh you will die, but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live." (Romans 8:13)

"Be holy as I am holy." (1 Peter 1:16)

"You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect." (Matthew 5:48)

This will be a simple entry. It is a call, brothers and sisters, simply to hate our sinfulness. My sin, too often, becomes an abstract thing to me, as I put it quickly within my mental theological construction. I talk of my sinfulness often, but I do it in a sanitized way, and I do it mainly as a piece of the puzzle to help explain the world to others. And to get them to look at their own sin, as I effectively ignore my own.

An Editorial on TV-watching

Dear friends,

The following is an editorial I am considering submitting to the Dalton Daily Citizen. It is fairly offensive to probably all of us, including myself. It takes a swing at excessive TV-watching, but I think that category could also be widened to all media, and beyond that, to all things that take time away from God and seek to replace him in our lives (idolatry).

There are a lot of ideas and several sermons packed into quite a tiny space here - I had only 500 words. It is not an explicitly Christian editorial, but one that certainly draws deeply upon Christian truth. It was my intention to get a wide audience with this one, and then offend them into deep conversation - specifically about who they are...

Television is ruining America! That’s polemic, I know, so grant me this article to properly qualify it. Rest assured, my solution is not to abolish TV, else I would prove to be quite the hypocrite.

First, there is plenty of objectionable content on television: drugs, cussing, sex, and violence. It is often a coin toss whether we will witness a couple making out (pornography with clothes on?) or someone getting blown up. By the end of elementary school, a student will have watched, on average, 8000 murders on television. Yes, the content can be bad, but let’s delve further, lest we miss the forest for the trees.

The second, deeper issue runs straight to our hearts, presses the uncomfortable question of identity, and asks us who we are? We will reap what we sow. The average American who lives to 65 will have watched 9 years of TV in his life. What will be the harvest reaped from 9 years sown in front of the tube?

We live in noise with thousands of voices vying for our attention. My voice here is one small drop in an ocean of them, many of them coming from media. What, we should ask, are they trying to tell us (during those 9 years)? It is precisely here at this pressing question, against the naïve assumption that I can watch unaffected, that I am chiefly disturbed. My natural tendency, and I suspect yours as well, is to be (perhaps) worried about the objectionable material, and when it is absent, to be relieved. Telling our brains, “No worries here”, we remain unaware of a deeper war for our minds and hearts. Being therefore defenseless, we are slowly slain by what is “okay”.

By necessity, I have a set of most basic beliefs, not all of which are consciously formed. For every belief or action, we may ask, “Why do you believe/do that?” For a basic belief, the answer is something like, “Just because.” How can you tell a man’s basic beliefs? Look at his time, his money, and what he runs to when nothing else demands his attention. I am worried because we often run most easily to TV, and we unintentionally give TV the power to tell us where to run.

By our TV habit, America soaks up ruinous basic beliefs. In most of the unobjectionable “okay” material, we still receive this message: “Everything is about you. You should get what you want… right now.” And then the commercials: “Let me tell you what you want.” As Charlie Brown complained of Christmas, so I complain of modern life - it’s too commercial. A Charlie Brown reference to prove this point – what irony!

As an American, I argue vehemently for your freedom to watch television; as your friend, I argue just as vehemently that you should not waste your freedom mainly in that way; as a man, I argue that putting self at the center will end in ruin for self and eventually for society.

To My Professor (and Class)

By way of introduction, I am in a class at Kennesaw State University with a very liberal professor and a lot of students who take in the erosion of truth without much thought. I could use a lot of prayer. The following is a reflection that I posted on our website that everyone gets to read. I posted it after most of the students would have read, but my hope and prayer is that it would be a cause of deep thought for my professor. I know this will be hard to read, but I still believe some of you guys may appreciate it...

Desiring God Conference: Francis Chan on Prayer

Don't watch this if you want to stay the same. Don't watch it unless you want your life to be ruined in a good way. Francis Chan convicts my socks off because he always brings me back to the reality of God. Too often we move off the basics to master some complicated theological point, but those basics are colossally amazing. This video so greatly makes me want to be a man of prayer; Chan's example and exhortation drives me to the Father, to Jesus, and to the Holy Spirit!

The Word: 1 John 1:1-4

That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon and have touched with our hands, concerning the word of life - the life was made manifest, and we have seen it, and testify to it and proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and was made manifest to us - that which we have seen and heard we proclaim also to you, so that you too may have fellowship with us; and indeed our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ. And we are writing these things so that our joy may be complete. 


This is my first blog entry that deals solely with a text of Scripture. I am actually quite nervous because I know that teachers will be judged more strictly, though I don't know exactly how that is going to work itself out. I feel inadequate; I feel the weight of my sin; I feel the seriousness of the task. All I can ask is that you would read prayerfully, and it is my hope that constantly your eyes would be drawn away from what I have written and to the bolded Word of God. 

Journey with Jack: Mere Christianity (Some Objections)

Chapter 2 of "Mere Christianity" seeks to answer objections to the idea of the Moral Law as it was established in Chapter 1. A potential objection: "Isn't what you call the Moral Law simply our herd instinct and hasn't it been developed just like all our other instincts?" 

Journey with Jack: Mere Christianity (The Law of Human Nature)

I am currently in a class at Kennesaw State University with a liberal professor who has launched a not-so-subtle attack on the idea of truth. I, of course, want to humbly and courageously speak the words God would have me to speak to her and to our class as a whole. For any who read this, prayer would be greatly appreciated.

There are a couple of ways I want to work on protecting and preparing my mind, especially within such a skeptical, humanist atmosphere. I want to, first and foremost, keep myself tethered to Scripture, letting its words shape me, flatten me, and transform me. Second, I want to read from great defenders of truth. In my readings I find few greater or more creative or more insightful defenders of truth than CS Lewis.

When I visited Nicole (my fiance) most recently, I retrieved a collection I had lent her, "The Complete C.S. Lewis Signature Classics", and I began re-reading "Mere Christianity". This is one of those books that I started reading a while back, would get through a couple of chapters, and would then put it down for six months. I'd then pick it up again, read back to that point, and go a few chapters further. This happened several times, as I chipped away, bit by bit. For those unfamiliar with him, C.S. Lewis is not exactly light reading. He is not as dense as some, like John Owen or Edwards in places, but he requires concentration. That concentration pays off, though.

Pickin' Piper's Brain: Think (2)

One of John Piper's favorite theologians is mid-eighteenth century New England pastor Jonathan Edwards. While Edwards is primarily - and regrettably - known only for his sermon "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God", he is considered by some (like Christian historian Mark Noll) to be perhaps the greatest thinker America has seen. The second chapter of Piper's book "Think" deals with the implications of Edwards' vision of the Trinity for the life of the mind.